Talk:Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Explorers of Time and Explorers of Darkness

What is this?

What's Pokémon Mystery Dungeon 2? I've never heard of it. Myth 15:35, 29 June 2007 (CDT)

See the Wikipedia article. It was only announced in May, and the English title isn't even known yet. It seems to be focussed on loot rather than good deeds. Garrett^Talk 15:41, 29 June 2007 (CDT)

I dunno, this may be crazy concept, but I've heard that people use this site called Google to look things up. Maybe you've never heard of that either. Procyon (Talk) 15:44, 29 June 2007 (CDT)

Mystery Dungeon "2" Reference

Can we even call it "Mystery Dungeon 2?" It's not in either of the games' titles, and from the description it doesn't even seem much different than the originals. --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 22:34, 10 February 2008 (CST)

Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Explorers of Time and Explorers of Darkness or Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Explorers of Time and Darkness. Wikipedia uses the first, but the second is shorter. Why couldn't it have just been named Time and Darkness... -- Prod (Talk) 21:55, 12 February 2008 (CST)

What matters more: The game name or the Walkthrough?

We're all focusing on the name itself that we don't focus on the big picture. We here at Strategywiki are for making strategy guides, and not for interpreting names. I've been working on the guide for a month now with the Japanese version, and meanwhile you all here are talking about the name! Let's get working! And just to settle our current debate, the two games are Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Explorers of Time and Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Explorers of Darkness.--GaleZephule 10:55, 21 February 2008 (CST)

Ordinarily, I would not bother to take time out of the day to say this, but I think your response to Prod and NMH's question warrants a proper reaction. No matter how zealous you are about the work that you're doing, your answer to their legitimate question was extremely rude and dismissive. Your work will amount to nothing if people can't find your guide under the proper name that it belongs to. SW doesn't just need guide authors, it needs authors who are capable of compromising and working cooperatively with other authors, sys ops, and editors of this site. You have just demonstrated that you are not very capable of this, and perhaps SW would be better off without someone with your level of maturity, regardless of the content you may have contributed. Procyon (Talk) 12:24, 21 February 2008 (CST)